Academics may be leaning on a novel strategy to influence peer review of their research papers — adding hidden prompts ...

You are also welcome to talk to me about your peer feedback to help you understand it better. Evaluation. I will evaluate your peer review on a completeness three-point scale (see below). Peer review ...

The explosion in the number of papers being submitted to postwar journals may have provided a secondary motivation. Physical Review, for example, went from publishing 2,310 pages in 1940 to ...

Peer review is important for preventing false claims, ... outline the qualities that their medical editors evaluate before sending papers to peer ... reducing its accuracy. For example, some ...

Writing a peer review. Your review, combined with the editor’s own assessment of the paper, will serve as the basis for the publishing decision. Sometimes journals give reviewers formal guidelines.

A 2016 paper, for example, found that 20 percent of life scientists completed between 69 percent and 94 percent of a reviews. While the paper called these academics “peer-review heroes,” it also noted ...

Sakana’s paper also didn’t undergo as much scrutiny as some other peer-reviewed publications. Because the company withdrew it after the initial peer review, the paper didn’t receive an ...

That is the number of potential peer-reviewers I had to approach for a paper in a top mental health and addiction journal I ...

Publishing peer review files at Nature has been optional since 2020; starting Monday, it is now automatic.