News
April 17 (UPI) --A federal Judge ruled Thursday that Google has willfully monopolized digital advertising in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Judge Leonie Brinkema said Google has harmed ...
Google violated the Sherman Antitrust Act “by willfully acquiring and maintaining ... Those in the digital advertising industry often draw a distinction between display ads that run on the ...
All seven lawsuits allege anti competitiveness, specifically, violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which “sets ... conspiracy was the biggest draw for RealPage’s clients.
Professional sports leagues have been under scrutiny for their actions under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act for well over ... profit not only by the drawing capacity of its team ...
Google has been hit with a major legal blow in an antitrust lawsuit, with a federal judge ruling that the search giant violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act. The ruling could potentially change ...
In a landmark decision, Judge Amit Mehta of the US District Court ruled Google violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by stifling competition and arranging exclusive and restrictive contracts with ...
WAILIN WONG, BYLINE: The DOJ accuses Apple of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act by, quote, "monopolizing smartphone markets," end quote. And how, supposedly, has it been doing that? Well ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results