Academics may be leaning on a novel strategy to influence peer review of their research papers — adding hidden prompts ...

Writing a peer review. Your review, combined with the editor’s own assessment of the paper, will serve as the basis for the publishing decision. Sometimes journals give reviewers formal guidelines.

The explosion in the number of papers being submitted to postwar journals may have provided a secondary motivation. Physical Review, for example, went from publishing 2,310 pages in 1940 to ...

You are also welcome to talk to me about your peer feedback to help you understand it better. Evaluation. I will evaluate your peer review on a completeness three-point scale (see below). Peer review ...

Sakana’s paper also didn’t undergo as much scrutiny as some other peer-reviewed publications. Because the company withdrew it after the initial peer review, the paper didn’t receive an ...

Publishing peer review files at Nature has been optional since 2020; starting Monday, it is now automatic.

That defense is peer review. The practice of peer review was developed in a different era, when the arguments and analysis that led to a paper’s conclusion could be succinctly summarized within ...

Peer review is the process by which scholar’s assess the quality and accuracy of one another’s research papers. Peer review is most frequently employed within academia, where professors ...

That is the number of potential peer-reviewers I had to approach for a paper in a top mental health and addiction journal I ...

In the humanities, for example, double-blind peer review is favoured. This is where two external peer reviewers review the paper and send their reviews to the editor handling that paper.