A Nikkei investigation reveals that researchers from 14 universities, including Waseda, KAIST and Peking University, embedded ...

Introduction Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a major global healthcare challenge. This is, in part, due to the lack of treatment response and chronic course of MDD. Such a course of illness is ...

Hospital and health system leaders are embracing collaboration — both across teams and through mentorship — to improve performance and team engagement. Becker’s connected with seven healthcare ...

Inside the scandal that rocked behavioural science – and paved the way for revolution - LET’S UNPACK THAT: Five years after a ...

Background Type 2 diabetes is a growing public health concern, and it continues to disproportionately impact priority populations. Although earlier and more frequent screening of diabetes promotes ...

In the humanities, for example, double-blind peer review is favoured. This is where two external peer reviewers review the paper and send their reviews to the editor handling that paper.

In the blog post, Sakana admits that its AI occasionally made “embarrassing” citation errors, for example incorrectly attributing a method to a 2016 paper instead of the original 1997 work.

Heck, take my field, astrophysics, for example. Every single day there are about forty to sixty brand-new astronomy and astrophysics papers birthed into the academic world.

Blasted on X Shortly after the paper’s publication on Feb. 13, 2024, researchers took to X to call it out and question how it made it through peer review.

When a blogger posted allegations that researchers at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute had manipulated data in published studies, the reports were shocking — and yet also familiar. Such cases ...

In late August, three geologists published a peer-reviewed academic paper in the journal Science Advances which posits that an enormous quantity of lithium, perhaps 20-40 million tons, lies within a ...